[Exclusive Investigation] Significant Differences in Image of Clinical Trials Based on Involvement
NQ Score
50/100
AI Summary (NQ-processed)
QLife conducted a survey on the awareness of clinical trials targeting 1,437 physicians, revealing key challenges.
AI analysis data is not yet available.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: What is the purpose of this survey?
- A: The purpose is to understand physicians' perceptions and challenges regarding clinical trials and to utilize this information for future clinical trial awareness campaigns.
- Q: What kind of physicians were targeted in the survey?
- A: Physicians belonging to specific departments (General Internal Medicine/Oncology/Gastroenterology, etc.).
- Q: What differences in perception of clinical trials were observed between physicians who have been involved and those who have not?
- A: Physicians with involvement experience tended to have positive perceptions such as 'expectation of efficacy,' 'social significance,' and 'as one of the treatment options,' while those without experience tended to perceive 'burden of explanation and consent procedures' and 'lack of time/resources.'
- Q: What were the main reasons cited for not referring patients to clinical trials?
- A: The top reasons included 'had not considered clinical trials as a treatment option' and 'were unaware of clinical trial information at other facilities.'
- Q: What initiatives does QLife plan to consider for promoting clinical trials in the future?
- A: QLife plans to consider initiatives such as raising awareness and educating the general public and patients about clinical trials, collecting patient voices, and supporting clinical trial recruitment for pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions.