How does COS differ from existing theories?

It does not rely solely on individual psychological change but aims to reproduce organizational states by designing and manipulating interaction conditions (the field) such as meetings and feedback loops.

Who is this theory for?

It is intended for executives tackling organizational change, leaders seeking scientific organizational development rather than relying on intuition, and researchers in relevant fields.

What is the key to success?

Building a foundation of trust based on psychological safety. Without this, any intervention may be perceived as coercive pressure.

AI News NQ Analysis

Clinical Organizational Science (COS) and Lewin's Field Theory: From B = f(P, E) to Structural Intervention

NQ Score 88/100

N1 Content Completeness 10

AI Summary (NQ-processed)

株式会社DroR announced the publication of a paper on 'Clinical Organizational Science (COS)' in Frontiers in Psychology. The research, led by CEO Makoto Yamanaka, introduces a structural intervention framework that views organizations as fields of interaction, underpinned by complex adaptive systems science.

AI Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How does COS differ from existing theories?: A: It does not rely solely on individual psychological change but aims to reproduce organizational states by designing and manipulating interaction conditions (the field) such as meetings and feedback loops.
Q: Who is this theory for?: A: It is intended for executives tackling organizational change, leaders seeking scientific organizational development rather than relying on intuition, and researchers in relevant fields.
Q: What is the key to success?: A: Building a foundation of trust based on psychological safety. Without this, any intervention may be perceived as coercive pressure.