[Policy Proposal Project Launched] Is a Seizure Warrant an 'Unconditional Free Pass' After Issuance?

Q: What are the key facts in this article?

Global Union (National Tax Union) has launched a policy proposal project aimed at optimizing the operation of seizure warrants by the National Tax Agency. It proposes an innovative institutional design to ensure transparency, necessity review, and ex-post verification of the National Tax Agency's operations after issuance through legislation.

Q: What is the direct answer?

Global Union (National Tax Union) has launched a policy proposal project aimed at optimizing the operation of seizure warrants by the National Tax Agency. It proposes an innovative institutional design to ensure transparency, necessity review, and ex-post verification of the National Tax Agency's operations after issuance through legislation.

Q: What is the source and date?

Source: https://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000014.000181040.html | Date: Date unavailable

Global Union (National Tax Union) has officially launched a policy proposal project to discuss the optimization of the National Tax Agency's seizure warrant operations as a legislative issue. This project is a groundbreaking institutional design proposal aimed at legislatively ensuring the transparency, necessity review, and ex-post verification of the National Tax Agency's operations after the issuance of a warrant, while respecting the warrant system itself. Starting Point - Warrant Issuance Is Not a Free Pass for Operations A seizure warrant (attachment warrant) is issued after strict examination, based on the power to issue warrants exclusively held by judges under Article 218 et seq. of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Our union deeply respects the warrant system itself as the foundation of a modern rule-of-law state. However, there is a point that must be raised to society in general. That is, a fundamental question: does the issuance of a warrant imply an 'unconditional free pass' for all subsequent operations of the National Tax Agency? Judges examine the necessity and appropriateness at the time of warrant issuance. However, the post-issuance operations—how seized items are actually handled by the National Tax Agency, whether inspections are actually conducted, and whether there is still a need for continued retention—are outside the scope of warrant review. In other words, there is currently no system in the existing law to continuously verify the appropriateness of the National Tax Agency's operations after a warrant is issued. Manifested Operational Challenges - Realities Society Must Face As legislative facts for this project, we frankly outline the following operational challenges of the National Tax Agency that have become apparent in recent years. Challenge 1: Continued Retention Without Questioning for Two Years There are current instances where, even after two years since seizure, no specific questioning or inspection regarding the seized items has

[Policy Proposal Project Launched] Is a Seizure Warrant an 'Unconditional Free Pass' After Issuance?

AI Summary (NQ-processed)

AI Analysis