Ko-Chia KY Announces Subsidiaries' Cumulative Acquisition of Same Securities Reaching 20% of Paid-in Capital
Key facts
- Ko-Chia KY Announces Subsidiaries' Cumulative Acquisition of Same Securities Reaching 20% of Paid-in Capital
- Seven subsidiaries of Ko-Chia KY—Suzhou Jiagi, Kede, Jiaca, Aipulai, Baihong, Jiahuang, and Jiajun—have acquired one-day treasury reverse repurchase agreements (GC001, code 204001) listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The cumulative investment has reached 20% of the company's paid-in capital, triggering a mandatory disclosure.
- Source: TWSE
- Date: Tue Jun 16 2026 09:00:00 GMT+0900 (Japan Standard Time)
Direct answer
Seven subsidiaries of Ko-Chia KY—Suzhou Jiagi, Kede, Jiaca, Aipulai, Baihong, Jiahuang, and Jiajun—have acquired one-day treasury reverse repurchase agreements (GC001, code 204001) listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The cumulative investment has reached 20% of the company's paid-in capital, triggering a mandatory disclosure.
- Citation
- Ko-Chia KY Announces Subsidiaries' Cumulative Acquisition of Same Securities Reaching 20% of Paid-in Capital (Tue Jun 16 2026 09:00:00 GMT+0900 (Japan Standard Time)), TWSE
- Source
- TWSE
- Date
- Tue Jun 16 2026 09:00:00 GMT+0900 (Japan Standard Time)
AI Summary (NQ-processed)
Seven subsidiaries of Ko-Chia KY—Suzhou Jiagi, Kede, Jiaca, Aipulai, Baihong, Jiahuang, and Jiajun—have acquired one-day treasury reverse repurchase agreements (GC001, code 204001) listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The cumulative investment has reached 20% of the company's paid-in capital, triggering a mandatory disclosure.
AI Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
- Q: What financial instrument did Ko-Chia KY's subsidiaries invest in?
- A: One-day treasury reverse repos (GC001) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, a safe short-term investment.
- Q: Why was this transaction disclosed as material information?
- A: Because cumulative investments reached 20% of paid-in capital, triggering regulatory disclosure rules in Taiwan.
- Q: Was the counterparty a related party?
- A: No, the transaction was with an unrelated third party in the open market.